The quality of architectural spaces plays a pivotal role in shaping the educational experience, influencing both learning outcomes and occupant well-being. This study investigates existing frameworks and methodologies used to evaluate the spatial quality of educational environments, with a focus on parameters such as functionality, flexibility, thermal and acoustic comfort, lighting, aesthetics, and user satisfaction. By critically analyzing quantitative and qualitative assessment tools, including post-occupancy evaluations (POE), environmental performance metrics, and user-centric design criteria, the research identifies key indicators that contribute to effective learning spaces. The study also explores interdisciplinary approaches that bridge architecture, pedagogy, and environmental psychology, proposing a comprehensive evaluation framework adaptable to diverse educational contexts. The findings aim to guide architects, educators, and policymakers in designing and assessing educational facilities that enhance learning, promote inclusivity, and support long-term sustainability.

Architectural space quality, educational environments, spatial evaluation frameworks

Ale, T. A., & Ayeni, D. A. (2024). Enhancement of work place comfort through the use of soft landscape. City Territ Archit, 11, 5–6.

Balova, S. L., de Velazco, J. J. H. G., Polozhentseva, I. V., Chernavsky, M. Y., & Shubtsov, L. V. (2021). The formation of the concept of smart sustainable city with the purpose of environmental protection. J. Environ. Managem., 12, 1269–1275.

Barrese, J. (1983). Efficiency and equity considerations in the operation of transfer of development right plans. Land Economics, 59, 238–245.

Debord, G. (2017). Psychogeography. Ad Marginem Press.

Dessouky, N. (2016). Procedia Environmental Sciences. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 34, 401–410. doi:10.1016/j.proenv.2016.04.035

Digital Talent. (2017). Road to 2020 and beyond: A national strategy to develop Canada’s talent in a Global Digital Economy. Information and communications technology council.

Fairclough, G., Sarlov, I., & Swanwick, C. (2018). Routledge handbook of Landscape Character Assessment. Current approaches to characterization and assessment. Routledge.

Hallsmith, G. (2003). The key to sustainable cities: Meeting human needs. Transforming community systems. New Society.

Ivanova, E. V. (2014). Foreign experience of architectural planning of the subject-spatial environment of modern schools. Bulletin of the Moscow State Pedagogical University. Series: Pedagogy and Psychology.

Ivashova, V. A. (2020). Social practice of urban environment quality assessment. IOP Conference Series. Materials Science and Engineering, 775, 3–5.

Jagodzińska, K. (2015). Cultural Heritage Counts for Europe. Full Report.

Kornienko, S. (2017). Energy efficiency, environmental safety, economic efficiency – priority tasks of «green» construction. Bulletin of the Volgograd State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering. Series: Construction and Architecture, 49, 167–177.

Kuripta, O., Popova, E., & Osipova, S. (2021). Conceptual aspects of designing a software application for calculating the sustainability class of the habitat for real estate objects. Technology and technology: ways of innovative development, 125–132.

Lagutenkov, A. (2018). Smart city: from concept to implementation. Sci. and Life, 8, 102–106.

Maruna, M., Rodic, D., & Colic, R. (2018). Remodelling urban planning education for sustainable development: the case of Serbia. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ., 19, 658–680.

Naguib, D. (2014). Towards sustainability in Eco-cities, Faculty of Engineering. Cairo University.

Pryadko, I., & Ivanova, Z. (2017). Biosphere and social processes in the aspect of the design of the urban environment. Industrial and civil construction, 10, 12–17.

Smart Cities. (2011). Smart Technologies and Infrastructure for Energy, Water, Transportation, Buildings, and Government. Business Drivers. City and Supplier Profiles Market Analysis, and Forecasts Research Report. Executive Summary Boulder (CO, USA: Navigant Consulting, Inc).

Vinogradova, I. (2016). Modern school space: the main aspects of transformation. A new look, International Scientific Bulletin, 14, 131–132.

Yin, R. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage.